President Trump invoked 10 U.S.C. 12406 to deploy 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles without California’s approval—marking the first such move in 60 years. The White House labeled the anti‑ICE protests a “violent insurrection,” though Governor Newsom and Mayor Bass argue state and local law enforcement had the situation under control .
“Tear gas, pepper balls used on protesters as troop deployment draws backlash”
By June 8, roughly 300 Guard members were stationed near key federal sites. As protesters marched—including onto the 101 freeway—police and Guard forces used tear gas and pepper balls to disperse crowds line τo demonstrations outside detention centers, labeled “unlawful assemblies” by authorities .
“Pro-Trump officials back military response; local leaders cry authoritarianism”
Defense Secretary Hegseth and VP Vance praised the deployment, citing threats to federal agents. Meanwhile, Governor Newsom deemed it “purposefully inflammatory,” warning it would escalate tensions; Mayor Bass discouraged masks at protests and said she opposed federal intervention .
“Iconic imagery emerges from protests”
A viral moment captured a masked protester circling a burning car on a dirt bike, waving a Mexican flag—sparking accusations that it reinforces Trump’s narrative and fuels media traction .
“Protests enter day three with freeway shutdowns”
Multiple freeway blockages, including on the 101, and intense scenes downtown reflect ongoing unrest. Hundreds of demonstrators—many holding Mexican, Palestinian, and Salvadoran flags—continue to gather across Boyle Heights, Compton, and Paramount. Officials warn further confrontations are likely .
Why this matters:
- The deployment raises constitutional questions around presidential vs state authority over the National Guard.
- Civil liberties advocates fear escalation and suppression of peaceful dissent.
- Federal officials argue the intervention is meant to protect ICE personnel amid “violent mobs.”
Bottom line: Los Angeles is witnessing the first presidential federalization of the National Guard without state consent since 1965. Federal and local authorities are now in direct conflict over handling immigration‑related protests—setting the stage for a tense showdown over civil rights and state sovereignty.
