Categories: Top Stories

CJP directs Imran to follow law during long march

ISLAMABAD (INP): The Supreme Court on Friday ordered PTI chief and former prime minister Imran Khan to follow law and obey rules during his party’s long march.
During the hearing of the contempt case against PTI Chief Imran Khan, Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Umar Ata Bandia has remarked that the Supreme Court uses its authority in a cautious way saying it initiates contempt proceedings only when its orders are flouted.
A five-judge larger bench of the Supreme Court headed by CJP Bandial and comprising Justice Ijazul Ahsan, Justice Muneeb Akhtar, Justice Yahya Afridi, and Justice Mazahir Ali Naqvi heard the contempt of court case against former prime minister and PTI Chairman Imran Khan on Friday. At the outset of the hearing, the PTI lawyer submitted a detailed reply from Imran to the court.
Chief Justice of Pakistan Bandial remarked that the court hoped the PTI chief must have submitted a reply based on truth and facts. He said the court could not issue any order at this juncture. He remarked that the court always used its authority carefully and initiated contempt proceedings only when its orders were disobeyed.
Lawyer Salman Aslam Butt appeared before the court on behalf of the federal government. He said that the government had submitted its reply in detail. He said jammers were not installed during the PTI long march on May 25. He contended that the tweets of PTI leaders were available posted on that day. He said how come it was possible to post a tweet if there were jammers adding that the PTI leaders were also giving interviews to the media.
He said he submitted a USB to the court along with his reply which contained PTI leaders’ tweets records showing that jammers were not in place on that day. The chief justice remarked that he hoped that Imran’s lawyer would give a truthful reply regarding this assertion.
The court, however, allowed time to PTI lawyer Salman Akram Raja for submission of his reply. During hearing, the additional attorney general requested the court to bind the PTI to obey the law if it allowed the party to hold its rally. On this, the top judge remarked that there was already the May 25 court order available in this regard. CJP Bandial said that he hoped that the PTI would act upon the law. He, however, ordered the party to obey rules. After that, the court adjourned the hearing till next week.
IHC asks PTI to submit new plea for holding rally in Islamabad: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) Friday asked the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) to submit a new application to the administration if it wanted to hold a rally in the federal capital.
“If you are permitted to hold a rally in the federal capital, you will have to ensure that no roads will be blocked,” the court stated. A report on threat to Imran Khan’s life was also presented before the court. “According to intelligence reports, there is a threat of attack on Imran Khan. It is the responsibility of the government and the state to take this into consideration,” IHC Chief Justice Aamer Farooq remarked. “It is the right of political and non-political parties to protest.

The Frontier Post

Recent Posts

PHC stops NAB proceedings against Chinese company

Humayun Khan PESHAWAR: A divisional bench of Peshawar High Court (PHC) comprised of Justice Ijaz…

8 hours ago

EU army may be unlikely but unity on defense a must

Khaled Abou Zahr An exhibition of Western military equipment captured from Ukrainian forces by Russia…

8 hours ago

How retail can regenerate historic districts

Fady Halim and Joe Rached The growth of GCC cities has been remarkable. Between 1970…

8 hours ago

The Middle East’s ‘1989 moment’

Faisal J. Abbas There were a hectic but fruitful few days in Riyadh this week…

8 hours ago

Active Clubs: A new far-right threat to democratic elections

Broderick McDonald Across North America and Europe, the far-right Active Clubs movement is expanding at…

8 hours ago

This website uses cookies.