ISLAMABAD – On the second consecutive day of Panama Leaks case hearing, Supreme Court (SC) bench clarified the Sharif family to prove money trail, here or in trial court.
A three-member SC bench comprising Justice Ejaz Afzal, Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed and Justice Ijazul Ahsan resumed the hearing of Panamagate during which the bench said that the matter could have been resolved by showing assets and resources.
Justice Ijazul Ahsan said that Sharif family adopted the approach to not tell anything to the JIT that was tasked to inspect every available record.
Presenting arguments over Panamagate JIT report, Sharif family lawyer Khawaja Harris said that JIT proceeded from the mandate as it was allowed to find answers of only thirteen questions but it included two more queries by its own.
He said that neither JIT report is authentic nor its probe was fair. He said that JIT proceeded from the mandate as it was allowed to find answers of only thirteen questions but it included two more queries by its own.
No probe can be carried out on the report as JIT didn’t collect evidence through legal source, he continued.
He said Sharif family’s stance was not taken while compiling the report. The documents could have been taken from foreign governments as per National Accountability Bureau (NAB) rules. Justice Ejaz Afzal said that it’s not right to dismiss the record on the reason they were gathered from third party.
Justice Ijaz said that NAB rule also suggests that subordinate departments of government come under the definition of foreign states.
Justice Azmat remarked that Sharif family was given full chance to present its stance before JIT regarding London flats. He said PM Nawaz didn’t recognize his uncle during his JIT appearance.
Money trail of London flats is still a mystery, Justice Ijaz said.