UNITED NATIONS (Agencies): In speech after speech, world leaders dwelled on the topic consuming this year’s United Nations General Assembly meeting: Russia’s war in Ukraine. A few, such as Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari, prodded the world not to forget everything else.
He, too, was quick to bring up the biggest military confrontation in Europe since World War II, but was not solely there to discuss the conflict itself – nor its disruption of food, fuel and fertiliser markets. “The ongoing war in Ukraine is making it more difficult,” Buhari lamented, “to tackle the perennial issues that feature each year in the deliberations of this assembly.”
He went on to name a few: inequality, nuclear disarmament, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and the more than one million Rohingya refugees from Myanmar living in limbo for years in Bangladesh. In an environment where words are parsed,
onfrontations are calibrated, and worry is acute that the war and its wider effects could worsen, no one dismissed the importance of the conflict. But comments such as Buhari’s quietly spoke to a certain unease, sometimes bordering on frustration, about the international community’s absorption in Ukraine.
Those murmurs are audible enough that the United States’ UN ambassador, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, made a point of previewing Washington’s plans to address climate change, food insecurity, health and other issues during the diplomatic community’s premier annual gathering. “Other countries have expressed a concern that as we focus on Ukraine, we are not paying attention to what is happening in other crises around the world,” she said, saying that was not so.
Still, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken complained at a Security Council meeting days later that Russia’s invasion is distracting the UN from working on other important matters. In many years at the assembly, there is a hotspot or news development that takes up a lot of diplomatic oxygen. As former UN official Jan Egeland put it, “the world manages to focus on one crisis at a time”.
“But I cannot, in these many years as a humanitarian worker or a diplomat, remember any time when the focus was so strongly on one conflict only while the world was falling apart elsewhere,” said Egeland, now secretary-general of the international aid group Norwegian Refugee Council. Certainly, no one was surprised by the attention devoted to a conflict with Cold War echoes, oblique nuclear threats from Russian President Vladimir Putin, shelling that has endangered the continent’s largest atomic power plant, and far-reaching economic effects. The urgency only intensified during the week-long meeting as Russia mobilised some of its military reserves.
President Andrzej Duda of Poland – on Ukraine’s doorstep – stressed in his speech “we mustn’t show any ‘war fatigue’” regarding the conflict. But he also noted a recent trip to Africa left him pondering how the West has treated other conflicts. “Were we equally resolute during the tragedies of Syria, Libya, Yemen?” he asked himself, and the assembly. And didn’t the West return to “business as usual” after wars in Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Horn of Africa?
“While condemning the invasion of Ukraine,” Duda added, “do we give equal weight to fighting mercenaries who seek to destabilise the Sahel and threaten many other states in Africa?” He is not the only one asking.
After more than seven months of war, there have been pointed observations from some quarters about how quickly and extensively wealthy and powerful nations mobilised money, military aid, General Assembly votes to support Ukraine and offer refuge to its residents, compared with the global response to some other conflicts. South African foreign minister Naledi Pandor last month told reporters – and the visiting Blinken – that while the war is awful, “we should be equally concerned at what is happening to the people of Palestine as we are with what is happening to the people of Ukraine.”
At the UNGA, she added that, from South Africa’s vantage point, “our greatest global challenges are poverty, inequality, joblessness and a feeling of being entirely ignored and excluded”. Tuvalu’s prime minister, Kausea Natano, said the war should not “be an excuse” for countries to ignore their financial commitments to a top priority for his island nation: fighting climate change.
Part of Bolivian President Luis Arce’s speech compared the untold billions of dollars spent on fighting in Ukraine in a matter of months with the $11bn committed to the UN-sponsored Green Climate Fund over more than a decade. Most leaders made time for issues beyond Ukraine in their allotted, if not always enforced, 15 minutes at the mic. And some mentioned the war only in passing, or not at all.
Colombian President Gustavo Petro devoted his time to lambasting capitalism, consumerism, and the US-led war on drugs, particularly its focus on coca plant eradication. Krygyz President Sadyr Japarov, whose country has close ties to Russia, homed in on his homeland’s border dispute with Tajikistan. Jordan’s King Abdullah II briefly mentioned the war’s effects on food supplies, then moved on to sustainable economic growth, Syrian refugees, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Ukraine is undeniably a dominant concern for the European Union. But foreign policy chief Josep Borrell insisted the bloc has not lost sight of other problems. “It’s not a question of choosing between Ukraine and the others. We can do all at the same time,” he said. Yet diplomatic attention and time are precious, sought-after resources.